Personal
Reflections: A STATEMENT BY AN INDIAN ANGL0-INDIAN
By
Denis La Fontaine
I have a theory that the general character of
Anglo-Indians in Independent India has changed from generation to generation.
Certainly my cultural socialization, a product of the British system of
education In India is not as evolved as that of my children and is even less so
in relation to my grand children. It seems probable to me that this is a common
thread among all the Anglo-Indian families for whom India is the only home they
recognize, and who are therefore, here in India with their children and
grandchildren.
This generational difference in cultural outlook is,
I think, negligible between me and my parent’s generation and their parent’s
generation. This is because there was no real difference in the
inter-generational up-bringing of Anglo-Indians in pre-independent India. We
were all the product of what were then called (still are, in fact) Anglo-Indian
schools. The curriculum in these schools were designed by some unknown body of
Englishmen (who probably knew little, if anything, about India) and the
school-leaving standard, known as the Senior Cambridge, was massively English.
English language and English literature were primary subjects. Every school and
there were scores of them all over India, taught “The History of the British
Empire” with a cursory flitting over the history of India, our very ancient
country. I recall the Indian History textbook as being a very thin volume and
that disappeared from our desks after doing the Junior Cambridge exam. To get
that school-leaving certificate, we were required to be pretty well-informed
about the history of the British Empire with all its reported heroisms but were
guided into almost total ignorance of the history of the country we were
supposed to belong to.
The very competent teaching staff in all these schools, were almost all missionary and of foreign origin,
Jesuit priests, Irish Patrician, Irish Christian brothers and several orders of
nuns in the convents. English was the only spoken language (even the kitchen
staff and table waiters used it) and so it was essentially our mother tongue –
no other language was ever used by all generations in each household in pre-
independent India.
This being the background, it can be said that I am
partially representative of the last generation of Anglo Indians whose
education occurred in British India. I think our primary characteristic
(indeed, I think the way we perceived ourselves) was that we were misfits. Lack
of local language skill was probably the foremost factor causing this
perception.
Lack of Indian language skills was of no consequence
through the carefree days of school but I became distinctly uncomfortable about
it in later days when, despite strong inclinations, I had to carefully avoid
any interplay with the mass of interesting, ordinary Indians all around me
because I simply could not adequately communicate. My mastery of Hindi grammar
and scope of vocabulary was dreadfully abysmal. The awareness of being a misfit
was very strong and I believe it troubles most of my fellow Anglo-Indians and
(even though this problem was never discussed) I believe it was the sense of
being a misfits that led to large numbers of them
relocating to English-speaking environments.
At this point, still at a fairly tender age, I found
my way into the Indian Air Force and embarked on the fascinating business of
learning to fly an aeroplane as a weapon of war. The new life unfolded with its
all-absorbing attractiveness and that too in a set up where my misfit
characteristics were unimportant. The working language was English, all the
compulsory reading was in English and all the off-duty shenanigans with my
fellow cadets was also in English. Clearly, my fate was in my own hands. There
were no externally imposed limitations on my capability to achieve and thus my
discomforts diminished, I think. What I do know for sure was that my sense of
belonging soared.
I made some interesting discoveries during the
period of training. Almost all my buddies were pure Indian: I was no longer
surrounded only by the mixed-race variety like me. Almost all of them had been
to Anglo-Indian schools and our backgrounds were very similar. There were some
differences. Most of them, while quite as fluent in English as I was, were also
masters of their mother tongue and if that happened to be Tamil or Telegu or Malayalam or Punjabi or Bengali or whatever,
their smattering of Hindi (the so-called National language), was probably
marginally better than mine. But there were a few whose mother tongue was
essentially English, the only language spoken in their purely Indian homes
(Hindu or Muslim) and they were quite as shaky as I was in the use of any
Indian language. I wasn’t such a misfit after all and my love affair with the Air
Force and its people blossomed. My whole life became anchored to being part of
this country’s Air Force and part of this country itself.
Shortly after we were commissioned,
in the early 1950s, the exodus of
Anglo-Indians started off and went on for quite a while. It was a process that I
was quite unable to identify with largely, I think, because of my father’s
attitudes which I seem to have absorbed, lock, stock and barrel. In the last
two years of WWII, he came back to India from postings abroad and was moved as
Medical Officer to a British-officered Indian regiment in Bombay and later to
the Embarkation Head Quarters also in Bombay. I spent about a great number of
long winter holidays from school in the hills with him after a gap of many years
and got to learn a little about the working of the world.
He was particular about me meeting what he called a
“rare breed” of British Army officer. These were mostly graduates or
undergraduates who had been inserted into Army uniforms only because of the
war. They were all quite exercised about British exploitation of and unfairness
to this country. I remember discussions about protection of the Lancashire
cotton mills by blockage of machine weaving in India and several on the
discouragement of Indian industry. Some of them were determined to take up
matters with their MPs after demobilization, they were
so put out about it. I was an attentive listener, never a participant and
always looked forward to my father’s later explanations.
He was always pleased that I paid attention to
people with a “larger, unrestricted” outlook and told me I would never hear
such informed opinion from Empire-building, regular British army officers, the
only kind we ever met before the war started. Of course there were several of
that kind, that I also met during these holidays and they were invariably,
determinedly disparaging in their comments on this country, its incompetent
people and their insupportable habits and my father would identify, the “macho-snideness” so displayed usually when Indian officers were
present.
Another thing contributed to my enlightenment.
Before the war he had briefly been posted to a place called Wana
in the troubled tribal belt of the North West Frontier Province. He had brought
back
“official” pictures to show me (only me) of beheaded tribesmen who had been
“troublesome”. Their heads were stuck onto tall spikes that were mounted in
bazaar areas to warn all concerned of the probable consequence of anyone’s ”troublesomeness”. There were others with the tendon of
their heels severed so that they could hobble along but certainly couldn’t run.
I can’t remember if he described any legal process leading to these exhibitions
but only remember his distaste for this remarkable British barbarity.
The end result was that I grew up in an Anglo-Indian
household where the British and their record in India were viewed with some
objectivity. During those long-gone years I encountered several Englishmen who
struck me as being quite admirable but the general feeling remained that their
country’s management of mine was not. Then 1947 rolled in and included the
British government’s general roll-out. The positive, though vaguely defined
feeling in my system was that this was, indeed, a very good thing. To follow
them to their country was unthinkable.
There were quite a few other occurrences during
those holidays that must have hardened my attitudes. I met up with the families
of a couple of school mates and was somewhat shaken by their sisters. They too
were on holiday and together with some of their girlfriends dropped remarks about
how they couldn’t wait to get “home”. I remember one saying that the best view
of India was of the Gateway of India from the back of a ship leaving Bombay
Harbour. What I felt is best described as a distinct discomfort with such
statements. I wasn’t clear enough in my head to classify it as the pretentious
silliness that it actually was, but I was positively aware of not wanting to be
in that number.
Back to the Air Force.
After the training period was over and we entered the sharp end of the business
in op squadrons, my only life concern was to be good enough to be accepted and
to stay where I was. Certainly the worry of being a misfit in the nation’s
structure disappeared. I passed the
Service’s compulsory Hindi exam in 1955 and was advised by a kindly examiner to
read Hindi literature and smarten up my grammar and vocabulary. I’d had every
intention of doing so but Air Force business required so much reading and study
that that took first place. Hindi literature ( to my
everlasting regret) never figured significantly on my reading lists. My grammar
and vocabulary are still very scruffy but it doesn’t seem to matter much. I can
quite easily interact with anyone in this language. It seems strange that the
nature of my limitations placed me in the very good company of some excellent
Indians.
I am now retired and no longer in the warm lap of
this nation’s Air Force, that nurtured me so impersonally but so attractively
for the four decades of my productive life. I live in the boondocks of rural
Andhra Pradesh, a Telugu speaking state. I am now learning that language (I can
read and write it very slowly and speak it atrociously) and am content with my
existence right smack in the middle of a nation that I struggled to serve
faithfully and which has rewarded me with acceptance as a citizen of at least
some value.
Lastly there is one thing I must comment about. I
have heard some people visiting from abroad (Anglo-Indians among them) say that
India is an impossible place to live in if you are a minority community on the
grounds that they were outsiders and therefore anti-Hindu. The other huge,
enormous mass of Indian citizenry are not of this mind, which of course renders
the people who think thus as being more non-Indian outsiders than their
victims.
I bumped into one such person (a clearly non-local
man) in the local bank several years ago and he objected to my conversation
with the cashier in English rather than Hindi. I could see that the cashier (a
Telugu speaker) was not at all pleased. It is highly unlikely that this person,
or any of the few like him would offer me violence but even that is something
that I could take in my stride. If my days are to end by being scoffed at by
such people, I know very well that in the eyes of the nation, their Indianness will be considered questionable and mine
probably enhanced.
What better comfort for someone who once feared
being a misfit. I belong to a huge family of very pleasing people. JAI HIND.
-------------------------------
Editor’s
Note: The author is the late Chief of Air Staff, Air
Chief Marshal Denis Anthony La Fontaine. These views are entirely his and have
not been edited. The article forms a part of some essays he wrote during
retirement and that may be of interest to Indians, particularly Anglo-Indians, who
live here and anywhere else in the world who proudly profess their foundations
from India, along with great loyalty to the Indian nation.